4.7 Article

Angiotensin II activates the Smad pathway during epithelial mesenchymal transdifferentiation

期刊

KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL
卷 74, 期 5, 页码 585-595

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1038/ki.2008.213

关键词

angiotensin; Smad; tubuloepithelial cells; fibrosis; TGF-beta

资金

  1. SAF [2005-03378, 2004/06109]
  2. Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia
  3. Sociedad Espanola de Nefrologia
  4. Sociedad Espanola de Cardiologia
  5. Red tematica de Investigacion Renal
  6. REDINREN [ISCIII-RETIC RD06/0016/0004]
  7. Instituto de Salud Carlos III
  8. Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo, EU [LSHB-CT-2007-036644]
  9. FONDECYT, Chile [1080083]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Epithelial to mesenchymal transdifferentiation is a novel mechanism that promotes renal fibrosis and here we investigated whether known causes of renal fibrosis (angiotensin II and transforming growth factor beta, TGF beta) act through this pathway. We infused angiotensin II into rats for 1 day and found that it activated the Smad pathway which persisted for up to 2 weeks in chronically infused rats. Renal TGF-beta mRNA expression was increased at 3 days and its protein at 2 weeks suggesting Smad pathway activation occurred earlier than TGF-beta upregulation. In cultured human tubuloepithelial cells, angiotensin II caused a rapid activation of Smad signaling independent of TGF-beta however, Smad-dependent transcription after 1 day was TGF-beta mediated. Two weeks of angiotensin II infusion activated genes associated with epithelial mesenchymal transdifferentiation. Stimulation with angiotensin II for 3 days caused transdifferentiation of the cultured epithelial cells by TGF-beta-mediated processes; however, early changes were independent of endogenous TGF-beta. Smad7 overexpression, which blocks Smad2/3 activation, diminished angiotensin II-induced epithelial mesenchymal transdifferentiation. Our results show that angiotensin II activates the Smad signaling system by TGF-beta-independent processes, in vivo and in vitro, causing renal fibrosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据