4.4 Article

Transvenous extraction of an eight-year-old ventricular lead accidentally implanted into the left ventricle

期刊

KARDIOLOGIA POLSKA
卷 71, 期 12, 页码 1317-1321

出版社

POLSKIE TOWARZYSTOWO KARDIOLOGICZNE
DOI: 10.5603/KP.2013.0333

关键词

endocardial left ventricular lead extraction; incorrect left ventricular pacing; unintentional left ventricular lead location

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Incorrect implantation of a ventricular pacemaker (PM) lead into the left ventricle (LV) is a known problem associated with permanent pacing. The optimal management of such cases identified late has not been clearly established. Generally acceptable management options are: open-chest cardiac surgery using cardio-pulmonary bypass, chronic anticoagulation and antiplatelet-drugs therapy. Rarely, the problem is solved by percutaneous LV lead extraction. We present a case of a patient with DDD pacing and ventricular lead implanted incorrectly into the LV apex region via an atrial septal defect eight years ago. Chronic PM pocket infection developed after replacement of the device. Both leads were extracted percutaneously, and the embolic protection system (Filter-Wire EZ, Boston Scientific) was used to reduce cerebral circulation embolism. The hardest connective tissue adhesions affecting the lead and the anodal ring were found in the LV. Less dense surrounding fibrous tissue around the lead was present at all levels of the venous course of the lead and in the right atrium. Very small fragments of apparently connective tissue remnants were found in cerebral circulation protection filters, and had been removed after the procedure. We conclude that old, permanently implanted LV leads may be extracted percutaneously, especially when there is an increased risk of cardiac surgery, or where the patient's consent for surgical treatment is lacking. In order to perform the procedure it is recommended to establish a cerebral protection system and intraoperative transoesophageal echocardiography which are mandatory for successful lead removal.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据