4.5 Article

Activity Limitations, Use of Assistive Devices or Personal Help, and Well-Being: Variation by Education

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbu115

关键词

Affect; Assistive devices; Education; Mobility limitations; Personal help; Self-care limitations; Self-efficacy; Self-realization

资金

  1. National Institute on Aging [U01-AG032947, P30-AG012846]
  2. Center for Family and Demographic Research, Bowling Green State University from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [R24HD050959]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives. This study examined the associations among self-care or mobility limitations, use of assistive devices or personal help, and well-being while giving special attention to 3 dimensions of well-being and older adults' educational attainment. Method. The analysis was based on 4,456 community-dwelling older adults with self-care or mobility limitations who completed interviews in the first round of the National Health and Aging Trends Study. Path models were estimated to examine the associations among limitations, use of assistive devices or personal help, and 3 dimensions of well-being (positive affect, self-realization, and self-efficacy) for different educational groups of older adults. Results. Self-care or mobility limitations had a negative association with 3 dimensions of well-being. The use of assistive devices was positively related, but the use of personal help was negatively related to well-being. Older adults with more education demonstrated weaker associations between assistive devices and well-being and stronger inverse associations between personal help and well-being than those with less education. Discussion. The use of coping strategies to address self-care or mobility limitations is not necessarily associated with better well-being, and education does not seem to play a protective role once limitations develop. More research is needed to unpack population heterogeneity in the association between coping strategies and well-being.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据