4.7 Article

Cohort Effects in Age-Associated Cognitive Trajectories

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glt181

关键词

Cognitive aging; Cognitive impairment; Dementia; Epidemiology; Socioeconomic status

资金

  1. National Institute on Aging [R01AG023651, R01AG07562, P30AG008017, R01AG033581]
  2. National Institutes of Health
  3. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. The age-specific prevalence and incidence of dementia and cognitive impairment in the United States have either remained stable or even slightly declined during the 1980s-1990s. A suggested but untested reason for this improvement in cognitive function over time is higher educational attainment among more recent cohorts. Methods. We used data from two large prospective population-based epidemiological dementia studies conducted in two adjacent regions during the period 1987-2012. We examined whether (i) cohort effects could be observed in age-associated trajectories of cognitive functions and (ii) the observed cohort effects could be explained by educational attainment. Trajectories of neuropsychological tests tapping three domains (psychomotor speed, executive function, and language) were compared among cohorts born between 1902 and 1911, 1912 and 1921, 1922 and 1931, and 1932 and 1943. We examined Age x Cohort interactions in mixed-effects models with/without controlling for education effects. Results. Cohort effects in age-associated trajectories were observed in all three domains, with consistent differences between the earliest born cohort and the most recent cohort. Executive functions showed the strongest and persistent differences between the most recent and other three cohorts. Education did not attenuate any of these associations. Conclusions. Cohort effects were observed in all examined cognitive domains and, surprisingly, remained significant after controlling for educational effects. Factors other than education are likely responsible for the cohort effects in cognitive decline.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据