4.7 Article

Creating a Computer Adaptive Test Version of the Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/gerona/63.11.1246

关键词

Outcome assessment (Health Care); Geriatrics; Rehabilitation

资金

  1. National Institute on Aging/National Institutes of Health [R41 AG027620-01]
  2. Independent Scientist Award [K02 HD45354-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. This study applied item response theory (IRT) and Computer adaptive testing (CAT) methodologies to develop a prototype function and disability assessment instrument for use in aging research. Herein, we report on the development of the CAT version of the Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument (Late-Life FDI) and evaluate its psychometric properties. Methods. We used confirmatory factor analysis. IRT methods. validation. and computer simulation analyses of data collected from 67 1 older adults residing in residential care facilities. We compared accuracy, precision. and sensitivity to change of scores from CAT versions of two Late-Life FDI scales with scores from the fixed-form instrument. Score estimates front the prototype CAT versus the original instrument were compared in a sample of 40 older adults. Results. Distinct function and disability domains were identified within the Late-Life FDI item bank and used to construct two prototype CAT scales. Using retrospective data. scores from computer simulations of the prototype CAT scales were highly correlated with scores front the original instrument. The results of computer simulation. accuracy, precision, and sensitivity to change of the CATs closely approximated those of the fixed-form scales. especially for the 10- or 15-item CAT versions. In the prospective study. each CAT was administered in <3 minutes and CAT scores were highly Correlated with scores generated from the original instrument. Conclusions. CAT scores of the Late-Life FDI were highly comparable to those obtained from the full-length instrument with a small loss in accuracy, precision. and sensitivity to change.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据