4.1 Article

Developing clinically relevant biomarkers in inflammatory arthritis: A multiplatform approach for serum candidate protein discovery

期刊

PROTEOMICS CLINICAL APPLICATIONS
卷 10, 期 6, 页码 691-698

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/prca.201500046

关键词

LC-MS/MS; Luminex; Multiplexing; Psoriatic and Rhuematoid Arthritis; SOMAscan

资金

  1. European Commission under the EU FP7 Programme MIAMI - Monitoring Innate immunity in Arthritis and Mucosal Inflammation
  2. Programme for Research in Third level Institutions
  3. Pfizer
  4. Abbott
  5. Roche
  6. MSD
  7. Amgen
  8. UCB
  9. ReumaFonds [LLP-10] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To identify candidate biomarkers that have the potential to distinguish between patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) or rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and explore the value of combining different protein discovery platforms for the development of a multiplexed protein biomarker panel. Experimental design: Serum samples from 32 patients (PsA; n = 16 and RA; n = 16) defined as active, early onset, and treatment naive were analyzed using unbiased label-free LC-MS/MS, a microsphere bead-based immunoassay (Luminex xMAP) and an aptamer-based assay (SOMAscan). Results: LC-MS/MS was used to quantify 324 proteins, while the Luminex xMAP targeted 48 proteins and SOMAscan supported the measurement of 1129 proteins. The combined data from these techniques gave reproducible quantification of 1501 proteins in total. Of these, 42 (LC-MS/MS), 3 (Luminex xMAP), and 127 (SOMAscan) proteins were found to be differentially expressed between PsA and RA (p < 0.05). Conclusion and clinical relevance: Using three different and potentially complementary proteomic platforms we identified a total of 172 proteins that are differentially expressed in patients with PsA compared to RA. These proteins collectively represent candidates for inclusion in a protein signature that could be developed as a diagnostic test to discriminate patients with PsA from RA and therefore be of clinical utility.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据