4.6 Article

Ototoxic destruction by co-administration of kanamycin and ethacrynic acid in rats

期刊

JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY-SCIENCE B
卷 12, 期 10, 页码 853-861

出版社

ZHEJIANG UNIV
DOI: 10.1631/jzus.B1100040

关键词

Ototoxicity; Ethacrynic acid; Kanamycin; Rat; Blood-cochlea barrier

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) of USA [R01 DC006630]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is well known that ethacrynic acid (EA) can potentiate the ototoxicity of aminoglycoside antibiotics (AmAn) such as kanamycin (KM), if they were applied at the same time. Currently, to create the model of EA-KM-induced cochlear lesion in rats, adult rats received a single injection of EA (75 mg/kg, intravenous injection), or followed immediately by KM (500 mg/kg, intramuscular injection). The hearing function was assessed by auditory brainstem response (ABR) measurement in response to click and/or tone bursts at 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, and 32 kHz. The static microcirculation status in the stria vascularis after a single EA injection was evaluated with eosin staining. The pathological changes in cochlear and vestibular hair cells were also quantified after co-administration of EA and KM. After a single EA injection, blood flow in vessels supplying the stria vascularis rapidly diminished. However, the blood supply to the cochlear lateral wall partially recovered 5 h after EA treatment. Threshold changes in ABR were basically parallel to the microcirculation changes in stria vascularis after single EA treatment. Importantly, disposable co-administration of EA and KM resulted in a permanent hearing loss and severe damage to the cochlear hair cells, but spared the vestibular hair cells. Since the cochlear lateral wall is the important part of the blood-cochlea barrier, EA-induced anoxic damage to the epithelium of stria vascularis may enhance the entry of KM to the cochlea. Thus, experimental animal model of selective cochlear damage with normal vestibular systems can be reliably created through co-administration of EA and KM.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据