4.6 Article

ISSR markers based on GA and AG repeats reveal genetic relationship among rice varieties tolerant to drought, flood, or salinity

期刊

JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY-SCIENCE B
卷 10, 期 2, 页码 133-141

出版社

ZHEJIANG UNIV
DOI: 10.1631/jzus.B0820183

关键词

Drought; Submergence; Salinity; Inter-simple sequence repeat-polymerase chain reaction (ISSR-PCR); (GA)(8)YG; Nagina22 (N22); FR13A; Pokkali

资金

  1. Department of Biotechnology (DBT)
  2. University Grants Commission-Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (UGC-CSIR)
  3. Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), Government of India
  4. Head, Crop Protection, Directorate of Rice Research (DRR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Drought, flood, salinity, or a combination of these limits rice production. Several rice varieties are well known for their tolerance to specific abiotic stresses. We determined genetic relationship among 12 rice varieties including 9 tolerant to drought, flood, or salinity using inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers. Based on all markers, the nine tolerant varieties formed one cluster distinct from the cluster of three control varieties. The salt-tolerant varieties were closest to two flood-tolerant varieties, and together they were distinct from the drought-tolerant varieties. (GA)(8)YG was the most informative primer, showing the highest polymorphic information content (PIC) and resolving power (Rp). The drought-, flood-, and salt-tolerant varieties grouped in three distinct clusters within the group of tolerant varieties, when (GA)(8)YG was used. Sabita was the only exception. The two aus varieties, Nagina22 and FR13A, were separated and grouped with the drought- and flood-tolerant varieties, respectively, but they were together in dendrograms based on other primers. The results show that ISSR markers associated with (GA)(8)YG delineated the three groups of stress-tolerant varieties from each other and can be used to identify genes/new alleles associated with the three abiotic stresses in rice germplasm.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据