4.5 Article

Characterization of lipidic markers of chondrogenic differentiation using mass spectrometry imaging

期刊

PROTEOMICS
卷 15, 期 4, 页码 702-713

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201400260

关键词

Biomedicine; Cartilage; Chondrogenesis; Lipids; MS imaging; Mesenchymal stem cells

资金

  1. ISCIII-Spain (PFIS)
  2. ISCIII-Spain (Miguel Servet)
  3. EU COST Action [BM1104]
  4. Fondo Investigacion Sanitaria, Madrid, Spain [CIBER-CB06/01/0040, PI12/00329, PI11/02397, RETIC-RIER-RD12/0009/0018, Proteo-Red/ISCIII]
  5. FEDER (European Community)
  6. Xunta de Galicia (Red Gallega REDICENT)
  7. Dutch national program COMMIT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) are an interesting alternative for cell-based therapy of cartilage defects attributable to their capacity to differentiate toward chondrocytes in the process termed chondrogenesis. The metabolism of lipids has recently been associated with the modulation of chondrogenesis and also with the development of pathologies related to cartilage degeneration. Information about the distribution and modulation of lipids during chondrogenesis could provide a panel of putative chondrogenic markers. Thus, the discovery of new lipid chondrogenic markers could be highly valuable for improving MSC-based cartilage therapies. In this work, MS imaging was used to characterize the spatial distribution of lipids in human bone marrow MSCs during the first steps of chondrogenic differentiation. The analysis of MSC micromasses at days 2 and 14 of chondrogenesis by MALDI-MSI led to the identification of 20 different lipid species, including fatty acids, sphingolipids, and phospholipids. Phosphocholine, several sphingomyelins, and phosphatidylcholines were found to increase during the undifferentiated chondrogenic stage. A particularly detected lipid profile was verified by TOF secondary ion MS. Using this technology, a higher intensity of phosphocholine-related ions was observed in the peripheral region of the micromasses collected at day 14.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据