4.2 Article

Preparation and swelling behaviors of rapid responsive semi-IPN NaCMC/PNIPAm hydrogels

出版社

WUHAN UNIV TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1007/s11595-011-0365-3

关键词

sodium carboxylmethylcellulose(NaCMC); N-isopropyl acrylamide(NIPAm); semi-IPN hydrgels; characterization

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50973129]
  2. Natural Science Found of Guangdong Province [07001781]
  3. Key Laboratory of Cellulose and Lignocellulosics Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Science [LCLC-2005-168]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Semi-interpenetrating network(semi-IPN) hydrogels composed of sodium carboxylmethyl cellulose(NaCMC) and poly N-isopropylacrylamide(PNIPAm) were prepared by free radical polymerization of N-isopropyl acrylamide(NIPAm) in dimethylsulfoxide(DMSO) in the presence of NaCMC. The structures of hydrogels were characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy(FTIR), scanning electron microscopy(SEM) and differential scanning calorimetry(DSC). SEM images show that the hydrogels present porous network structures. Most water in the hydrogels were free water and freezing water. The equilibrium swelling ratio(ESR) and swelling rate(SR) were quite different at various swelling temperature. ESR of the hydrogels ranged abruptly from 15.2 g/g to 1.56 g/g and the hydrogels changed from transparent into opaque with swelling temperature changing from 33 A degrees C to 34 A degrees C, that is to say, the hydrogels exhibited the good temperature sensitivity at about 33 A degrees C similar to low critical solution temperature(LCST) of pure PNIPAm, swelling rate were very different at below and above LCST due to hydrogel swelling with different swelling mechanism. Moreover, the semi-IPN hydrogels swelled much rapidly than pure PNIPAm hydrogels did at room temperature, the equillibrium swelling ratio(ESR) and swelling rate of the hydrogels increased with increasing of NaCMC content, i e. It is suggested that NaCMC could be potential for preparation of porous and rapid swelling hydrogels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据