4.4 Article

Tetrahydrofurfuryl Alcohol (THFA) Pulping of Rice Straw

期刊

JOURNAL OF WOOD CHEMISTRY AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 29, 期 2, 页码 101-118

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/02773810902796138

关键词

Organosolv pulping; pulp properties; rice straw; tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol pulping

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A 80-95% solution of tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol (THFA) added with 0.15-0.5% catalytic hydrochloric acid (HCl) was used to pulp rice straw. The pulping conditions applied for organosolv digestions of the straw at atmospheric pressure and 120C cooking for 4 h. The characteristics of the digestion, chemical properties of the resulting pulp, and the handsheet physical properties were evaluated. As for the pulp yields, the method has high delignification specificity, at kappa number 20, the yield was ca. 60%, about 15-20% higher than the traditional alkaline pulping method. Furthermore, with increasing THFA concentrations, efficacies of delignification also increased. Increasing the catalyst dosage also caused an increase in delignification. Delignification rate of 120C cooking are not so appreciable, but high yield were retained. If cooking temperatures were increased to 130 and 150C, although even higher delignification rates were achievable, the yield decreased as well. During the cooking the dissolution of carbohydrate was low, at most 23%, consisting of mostly hemicelluloses, which was as high as 78% of the dissolved carbohydrates. The optimal conditions of the THFA/HCl cooking applied 95% THFA, 0.50% HCl, temperature of 120C, and cooking time of 240 min. Residue lignin in the resulting pulp was low, and can be bleached to high brightness easily with a conventional bleaching sequence. If, however, energy and operation efficiency was a primary consideration, then a procedural heating scheme could be employed. The physical properties of the THFA pulp handsheets were inferior to those of the kraft pulp. The main reason was the damage to cellulose sustained during the acidic cooking condition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据