4.7 Article

A comparative study of typhoon wind profiles derived from field measurements, meso-scale numerical simulations, and wind tunnel physical modeling

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2014.05.001

关键词

Field measurements; Typhoon boundary layer; Wind tunnel test; WRF simulation

资金

  1. RGC General Research Fund
  2. HKSAR [9041338, DAG11EG06]
  3. Hong Kong Observatory

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To investigate the applicability and limitations of both physical (wind tunnel test) and numerical (weather prediction) simulations of the atmospheric boundary layer, field measurements from a Doppler SODAR and a wind-profiler were combined to serve as validation criteria when comparing the results from a numerical simulation conducted by the Weather Research and Forecast model (WRF) and from wind tunnel testing. The comparisons focused on the simulation of the typhoon boundary layer, and revealed that a major drawback of wind tunnel testing is the use of an unrealistic approaching wind profile. As a result, the wind tunnel test results should only be considered valid when the measured wind profile is influenced predominantly by the underlying terrain. Meanwhile, the relatively coarse resolution of the underlying terrain model used in the numerical weather prediction system may lead to an inaccurate mean wind speed profile at lower altitudes, especially when the winds are coming from the land fetch. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据