4.7 Article

Investigation into the relationship of the overlap ratio and shift angle of double stage three bladed vertical axis wind turbine (VAWT)

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2012.03.021

关键词

Overlap ratio; Shift angle; Vertical axis wind turbine VAWT; Savonius wind turbine; Phase-shift angle

资金

  1. Sun Hung Kai Properties Group based in Hong Kong [ZZ1T]
  2. Hong Kong Polytechnic University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents the experimental test results of Savonius-type vertical axis wind turbines (VAWT) with different overlap ratios and shift angles. Each wind turbine was tested under four different wind speeds. The power coefficients (C-p) of vertical axis wind turbines are governed by several key factors, e.g. the number of blades, the shape of the blades, the overlap ratio (OL) and the phase shift angle. The overlap ratio and the phase shift angle (PSA) are the most decisive ones since the measured data shows that their power coefficient drops or rises with them significantly. Three turbines with the overlap ratios of 0, 0.16 and 0.32 were designed and constructed. The wind turbines were then adjusted to the phase shift angles (PSA) of 0, 15, 30, 45 and 60 degrees before testing them in an open wind tunnel under the air velocities of 4 m/s, 6 m/s, 8 m/s and 10 m/s. The results show that a higher overlap ratio has a higher impact on improving the starting characteristics of the Savonius wind turbine than any phase shift angle changes. This investigation shows that a specific phase shift angle in relation to a specific air velocity will increase the power coefficient significantly. Besides the increase of the power coefficient seen at specific air velocities and phase shift angles, did the recorded data show an unexpected second performance peak which appeared at higher tip speed ratios. This is surprising since the Savonius turbine is considered as being a drag driven turbine, and suggests that the lift characteristics of Savonius turbines might be more significant than commonly considered. (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据