4.3 Article

Population Estimation and Monitoring of an Endangered Lagomorph

期刊

JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT
卷 75, 期 1, 页码 151-158

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.17

关键词

capture-recapture; lagomorph; pellet count; population estimation; rabbit density; Sylvilagus palustris hefneri

资金

  1. United States Navy, Naval Air Station Key West, Boca Chica Key, Florida
  2. USFWS-Ecological Services, Vero Beach, Florida
  3. Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We conducted the most intensive estimate of the endangered Lower Keys marsh rabbit (Sylvilagus palustris hefneri) metapopulation to date using pellet surveys and capture-recapture methodology. We livetrapped 83 rabbits, evaluated 5 closed population models, and selected the model that best represented the data. We considered the variation in behavioral response model the best model and correlated (r(2) = 0.913) its patch population estimates to patch pellet densities. From the prediction equation, we generated a range-wide metapopulation estimate of 317 rabbits, a western clade population of 257 rabbits, an eastern clade population of 25 rabbits, and translocated marsh rabbit populations of 35 and zero on Little Pine and Water keys, respectively. A subset of patches whose marsh rabbit subpopulations were last estimated in 1993 exhibited a 46% decline in abundance over 15 yr. Due to the low estimate of the eastern clade population, special effort should be initiated to avoid loss of genetic diversity. The prediction equation suffers from limited data at high pellet densities, patches with >= 5 pellets/m(2). Future studies should investigate if the slope of the regression is indeed near 1 by sampling patches across the range of pellet densities, especially those with >= 5 pellets/m(2). The equation provides managers a quick, efficient, and noninvasive method to estimate marsh rabbit abundance from pellet counts but the confidence of predicted rabbit densities from high pellet density patches is low. (C) 2011 The Wildlife Society.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据