4.3 Article

Contrasting Activity Patterns of Sympatric and Allopatric Black and Grizzly Bears

期刊

JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT
卷 74, 期 8, 页码 1628-1638

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.2193/2009-571

关键词

activity budget; American black bear; brown bear; encounters; Global Positioning System (GPS); intra-guild predation; national park; Ursus americanus; Ursus arctos

资金

  1. United States Geological Survey
  2. Northern Rocky Mountain Science Center
  3. National Park Service

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The distribution of grizzly (Ursus arctos) and American black bears (U. americanus) overlaps in western North America. Few studies have detailed activity patterns where the species are sympatric and no studies contrasted patterns where populations are both sympatric and allopatric. We contrasted activity patterns for sympatric black and grizzly bears and for black bears allopatric to grizzly bears, how human influences altered patterns, and rates of grizzly-black bear predation. Activity patterns differed between black bear populations, with those sympatric to grizzly bears more day-active. Activity patterns of black bears allopatric with grizzly bears were similar to those of female grizzly bears; both were crepuscular and day-active. Male grizzly bears were crepuscular and night-active. Both species were more night-active and less day-active when <= 1 km from roads or developments. In our sympatric study area, 2 of 4 black bear mortalities were due to grizzly bear predation. Our results suggested patterns of activity that allowed for intra-and inter-species avoidance. National park management often results in convergence of locally high human densities in quality bear habitat. Our data provide additional understanding into how bears alter their activity patterns in response to other bears and humans and should help park managers minimize undesirable bear-human encounters when considering needs for temporal and spatial management of humans and human developments in bear habitats.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据