4.4 Article

Automatic construction of a large-scale situation ontology by mining how-to instructions from the web

期刊

JOURNAL OF WEB SEMANTICS
卷 8, 期 2-3, 页码 110-124

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.websem.2010.04.006

关键词

Automatic ontology construction; Situation ontology; Action mining; How-to instruction; Service recommendation; Automatic service composition

资金

  1. Ministry of Knowledge Economy, Korea, under the Information Technology Research Center [NIPA-2009-(C1090-0903-0008)]
  2. Ministry of Knowledge Economy [2008-F-047-02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the growing interests in semantic web services and context-aware computing, the importance of ontologies, which enable us to perform context-aware reasoning, has been accepted widely. While domain-specific and general-purpose ontologies have been developed, few attempts have been made for a situation ontology that can be employed directly to support activity-oriented context-aware services. In this paper, we propose an approach to automatically constructing a large-scale situation ontology by mining large-scale web resources, eHow and wikiHow, which contain an enormous amount of how-to instructions (e. g., How to install a car amplifier). The construction process is guided by a situation model derived from the procedural knowledge available in the web resources. Two major steps involved are: (1) action mining that extracts pairs of a verb and its ingredient (i.e., objects, location, and time) from individual instructional steps (e. g., ) and forms goal-oriented situation cases using the results and (2) normalization and integration of situation cases to form the situation ontology. For validation, we measure accuracy of the action mining method and show how our situation ontology compares in terms of coverage with existing large-scale ontology-like resources constructed manually. Furthermore, we show how it can be utilized for two applications: service recommendation and service composition. (C) 2010 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据