4.3 Article

Use of multiobjective particle swarm optimization in water resources management

期刊

出版社

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2008)134:3(257)

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Water resources management presents a large variety of multiobjective problems that require powerful optimization tools in order to fully characterize the existing trade-offs. Different optimization methods, based on mathematical programming at first and on evolutionary computation more recently, have been applied with various degrees of success. This paper explores the use of a relatively recent heuristic technique called particle swarm optimization (PSO), which has been found to perform very well in a wide spectrum of optimization problems. Many extensions of the single-objective PSO to handle multiple objectives have been proposed in the evolutionary computation literature. This paper presents an implementation of multiobjective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO) that evaluates alternative solutions based on Pareto dominance, using an external repository to store nondominated solutions, a fitness sharing approach to promote diversity, and a mutation operator to improve global search. The MOPSO solver is used on three applications: (1) test function for comparison with results of other MOPSO and other evolutionary algorithms reported in the literature; (2) multipurpose reservoir operation problem with up to four objectives; and (3) problem of selective withdrawal from a thermally stratified reservoir with three objectives. In the test function application, standard performance metrics were used to measure closeness to the true Pareto front and evenness of coverage of the nondominated set. Results for the other two applications are compared to Pareto solutions obtained using the epsilon-constraint method with nonlinear optimization (epsilon-NLP). MOPSO performed very well when compared with other evolutionary algorithms for the test function and also provided encouraging results on the water management applications with the advantage of being much simpler than the epsilon-NLP approach.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据