4.1 Article

Municipal wastewater treatment plants as pathogen removal systems and as a contamination source of noroviruses and Enterococcus faecalis

期刊

JOURNAL OF WATER AND HEALTH
卷 10, 期 3, 页码 380-389

出版社

IWA PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.2166/wh.2012.138

关键词

biosolids; Enterococcus faecalis; Enterococcus faecium; noroviruses; wastewater

资金

  1. Irish EPA STRIVE programme [2007-PhD-EH-3]
  2. Sligo General Hospital under Research Seed Grant
  3. School of Science, Institute of Technology, Sligo, Ireland
  4. Environmental Protection Agency Ireland (EPA) [2007-PhD-EH-3] Funding Source: Environmental Protection Agency Ireland (EPA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Municipal wastewater treatment plants play a crucial role in reducing the microbial and pathogen load of human wastes before the end-products are discharged to surface waters (final effluent) or land spread (biosolids). This study investigated the occurrence frequency of noroviruses, Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium in influent, final effluent and biosolids from four secondary wastewater treatment plants in northwestern Ireland (plants A-D) and observed the seasonal and spatial variation of the plant treatment efficiencies in the pathogen removals. It was noted that norovirus genogroup II was more resistant to the treatment processes than the norovirus genogroup I and other active viral particles, especially those in the discharge effluents. The percolating biofilm system at plant D resulted in better effluent quality than in the extended aerated activated sludge systems (plants A and B); primary biosolids produced at plant D may pose a higher health risk to the locals. The spread of norovirus genogroup II into the environment, irrespective of the wastewater treatment process, coincides with its national clinical predominance over norovirus genogroup I. This study provides important evidence that municipal wastewater treatment plants not only achieve pathogen removal but can also be the source of environmental pathogen contamination.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据