4.3 Article

Interactions between luminance and color signals: Effects on shape

期刊

JOURNAL OF VISION
卷 13, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

ASSOC RESEARCH VISION OPHTHALMOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1167/13.5.16

关键词

color-luminance interaction; color contrast; luminance contrast

资金

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC, UK) [EP/G038708/1, EP/G038597/1]
  2. Leverhulme Research Fellowship
  3. EPSRC [EP/G038708/1, EP/G038597/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/G038708/1, EP/G038597/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although luminance and color are thought to be processed independently at early stages of visual processing, there is evidence that they interact at later stages. For example, chromatic information has been shown to enhance or suppress depth from luminance depending on whether chromatic edges are aligned or orthogonal with luminance edges. Here we explored more generally how chromatic information interacts with luminance information that specifies shape from shading. Using a depth-matching task, we measured perceived depth in sinusoidal and square-wave gratings (specifying close-to sinusoidal and triangle-wave depth profiles, respectively) in three conditions. In the first, as we varied luminance contrast in the presence of an orthogonal chromatic grating, perceived depth increased (consistent with classical shape from shading). When we held the luminance at a fixed contrast and varied the chromatic grating in the other two conditions (orthogonal or aligned), we found large and inconsistent individual differences. Some participants exhibited the expected pattern of enhancement and suppression, but most did not, either for the sinusoidal or square-wave stimuli. Our results cast doubt on the idea that the interaction demonstrates a single high-level heuristic linked to depth perception. Instead, we speculate that interactions are more likely due to early cross-channel masking.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据