4.2 Article

Prostaglandin E-2 switches from a stimulator to an inhibitor of cell migration after epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition

期刊

PROSTAGLANDINS & OTHER LIPID MEDIATORS
卷 116, 期 -, 页码 1-9

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.prostaglandins.2014.10.003

关键词

PGE(2); Epithelial-mesenchymal transition; Chemotaxis, Tissue repair

资金

  1. University of Nebraska Medical Center

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is critical for embryonic development, and this process is recapitulated in adults during wound healing, tissue regeneration, fibrosis and cancer progression. Cell migration is believed to play a key role in both normal wound repair and in abnormal tissue remodeling. Prostaglandin E-2 (PGE(2)) inhibits fibroblast chemotaxis, but stimulates chemotaxis in airway epithelial cells. The current study was designed to explore the role of PGE(2) and its four receptors on airway epithelial cell migration following EMT using both the Boyden blindwell chamber chemotaxis assay and the wound closure assay. EMT in human bronchial epithelial cells (HBECs) was induced by TGF-beta(1) and a mixture of cytokines (IL-1 beta, TNF-alpha, and IFN-gamma). PGE(2) and selective agonists for all four EP receptors stimulated chemotaxis and wound closure in HBECs. Following EMT, the EP1 and EP3 agonists were without effect, while the EP2 and EP4 agonists inhibited chemotaxis as did PGE(2). The effects of the EP2 and EP4 receptors on HBEC and EMT cell migration were further confirmed by blocking the expected signaling pathways. Taken together, these results demonstrate that PGE(2) switches from a stimulator to an inhibitor of cell migration following EMT of airway epithelial cells and that this inhibition is mediated by an altered effect of EP2 and EP4 signaling and an apparent loss of the stimulatory effects of EP1 and EP3. Change in the PGE(2) modulation of chemotaxis may play a role in repair following injury. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据