4.3 Article

After-search-visual search by gaze shifts after input image vanishes

期刊

JOURNAL OF VISION
卷 8, 期 14, 页码 -

出版社

ASSOC RESEARCH VISION OPHTHALMOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1167/8.14.26

关键词

visual search; saliency; saccades; psychophysics; masking; after-search

资金

  1. Gatsby Charitable Foundation
  2. Cognitive Science Foresight [GR/E002536/01]
  3. BBSRC [BB/E000444/1, BB/E002536/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/E000444/1, BB/E002536/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It has been known that if an image containing many random items suddenly disappears, visual persistence and iconic memory vanish within similar to 0.2 seconds, such that observers are unable to report the identities of the items not graced by attention. We show that effects of the salience of image items can remain for up to more than a second longer, influencing both eye movements and explicit choice. In our experiment, subjects searched for a moderately salient target among 659 non-targets to report whether the target was in the left or right half of the display, guessing if necessary, while their gaze was tracked. In some trials, the search display was replaced by a mask before their gaze reached the target. We call such trials 'after-search' trials, and the behavior after the mask onset is after-searching. In after-search, subjects made 3.1 +/- 2.8 saccades on the mask before reporting. In some after-search trials called 'gaze-arrival' trials, they looked at the location of the vanished target after up to several on-mask saccades; in these trials, the subjects' reports were more accurate. This saliency effect begs the question of what memory, saccade generation, or other neural mechanisms might be responsible.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据