4.6 Article

Structure of Acidic pH Dengue Virus Showing the Fusogenic Glycoprotein Trimers

期刊

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY
卷 89, 期 1, 页码 743-750

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.02411-14

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NIH [R01 AI076331, R01 AI077955]
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [R01AI073755, R01AI076331] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Flaviviruses undergo large conformational changes during their life cycle. Under acidic pH conditions, the mature virus forms transient fusogenic trimers of E glycoproteins that engage the lipid membrane in host cells to initiate viral fusion and nucleocapsid penetration into the cytoplasm. However, the dynamic nature of the fusogenic trimer has made the determination of its structure a challenge. Here we have used Fab fragments of the neutralizing antibody DV2-E104 to stop the conformational change of dengue virus at an intermediate stage of the fusion process. Using cryo-electron microscopy, we show that in this intermediate stage, the E glycoproteins form 60 trimers that are similar to the predicted open fusogenic trimer. IMPORTANCE The structure of a dengue virus has been captured during the formation of fusogenic trimers. This was accomplished by binding Fab fragments of the neutralizing antibody DV2-E104 to the virus at neutral pH and then decreasing the pH to 5.5. These trimers had an open conformation, which is distinct from the closed conformation of postfusion trimers. Only two of the three E proteins within each spike are bound by a Fab molecule at domain III. Steric hindrance around the icosahedral 3-fold axes prevents binding of a Fab to the third domain III of each E protein spike. Binding of the DV2-E104 Fab fragments prevents domain III from rotating by about 130 degrees to the postfusion orientation and thus precludes the stem region from zipping together the three E proteins along the domain II boundaries into the closed postfusion conformation, thus inhibiting fusion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据