4.6 Article

Differential Adeno-Associated Virus Serotype-Specific Interaction Patterns with Synthetic Heparins and Other Glycans

期刊

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY
卷 88, 期 5, 页码 2991-3003

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.03371-13

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. German academic exchange service DAAD (PROMOS)
  2. Max-Planck Society
  3. Studienstiftung des Deutschen Volkes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

All currently identified primary receptors of adeno-associated virus (AAV) are glycans. Depending on the AAV serotype, these carbohydrates range from heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPG), through glycans with terminal alpha 2-3 or alpha 2-6 sialic acids, to terminal galactose moieties. Receptor identification has largely relied on binding to natural compounds, defined glycan-presenting cell lines, or enzyme-mediated glycan modifications. Here, we describe a comparative binding analysis of highly purified, fluorescent-dye-labeled AAV vectors of various serotypes on arrays displaying over 600 different glycans and on a specialized array with natural and synthetic heparins. Few glycans bind AAV specifically in a serotype-dependent manner. Differential glycan binding was detected for the described sialic acid-binding AAV serotypes 1, 6, 5, and 4. The natural heparin binding serotypes AAV2, -3, -6, and -13 displayed differential binding to selected synthetic heparins. AAV7, -8, -rh.10, and -12 did not bind to any of the glycans present on the arrays. For discrimination of AAV serotypes 1 to 6 and 13, minimal binding moieties are identified. This is the first study to differentiate the natural mixed heparin binding AAV serotypes 2, 3, 6, and 13 by differential binding to specific synthetic heparins. Also, sialic acid binding AAVs display differential glycan binding specificities. The findings are relevant for further dissection of AAV host cell interaction. Moreover, the definition of single AAV-discriminating glycan binders opens the possibility for glycan microarray-based discrimination of AAV serotypes in gene therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据