4.6 Article

MDA5 Localizes to Stress Granules, but This Localization Is Not Required for the Induction of Type I Interferon

期刊

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY
卷 87, 期 11, 页码 6314-6325

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.03213-12

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Rubicon grant
  2. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) [NWO-825.11.022, NWO-017.006.043]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Virus infection can initiate a type I interferon (IFN-alpha/beta) response via activation of the cytosolic RNA sensors retinoic acid-inducible gene-I (RIG-I) and melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (MDA5). Furthermore, it can activate kinases that phosphorylate eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 alpha (eIF2 alpha), which leads to inhibition of (viral) protein translation and formation of stress granules (SG). Most viruses have evolved mechanisms to suppress these cellular responses. Here, we show that a mutant mengovirus expressing an inactive leader (L) protein, which we have previously shown to be unable to suppress IFN-alpha/beta, triggered SG formation in a protein kinase R (PKR)-dependent manner. Furthermore, we show that infection of cells that are defective in SG formation yielded higher viral RNA levels, suggesting that SG formation acts as an antiviral defense mechanism. Since the induction of both IFN-alpha/beta and SG is suppressed by mengovirus L, we set out to investigate a potential link between these pathways. We observed that MDA5, the intracellular RNA sensor that recognizes picornaviruses, localized to SG. However, activation of the MDA5 signaling pathway did not trigger and was not required for SG formation. Moreover, cells that were unable to form SG-by protein kinase R (PKR) depletion, using cells expressing a nonphosphorylatable eIF2 alpha protein, or by drug treatment that inhibits SG formation-displayed a normal IFN-alpha/beta response. Thus, although MDA5 localizes to SG, this localization seems to be dispensable for induction of the IFN-alpha/beta pathway.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据