4.6 Article

CD4 T Cell Help Is Limiting and Selective during the Primary B Cell Response to Influenza Virus Infection

期刊

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY
卷 88, 期 1, 页码 314-324

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.02077-13

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NIAID Centers of Excellence for Influenza Research and Surveillance
  2. New York Influenza Center of Excellence
  3. National Institutes of Health [HHSN27220201200005C, HHSN266200700008C, R01AI51542, 5T32AI007285]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Influenza virus vaccination strategies are focused upon the elicitation of protective antibody responses through administration of viral protein through either inactivated virions or live attenuated virus. Often overlooked in this strategy is the CD4 T cell response: how it develops into memory, and how it may support future primary B cell responses to heterologous infection. Through the utilization of a peptide-priming regimen, this study describes a strategy for developing CD4 T cell memory with the capacity to robustly expand in the lung-draining lymph node after live influenza virus infection. Not only were frequencies of antigen-specific CD4 T cells enhanced, but these cells also supported an accelerated primary B cell response to influenza virus-derived protein, evidenced by high anti-nucleoprotein (NP) serum antibody titers early, while there is still active viral replication ongoing in the lung. NP-specific antibody-secreting cells and heightened frequencies of germinal center B cells and follicular T helper cells were also readily detectable in the draining lymph node. Surprisingly, a boosted memory CD4 T cell response was not sufficient to provide intermolecular help for antibody responses. Our study demonstrates that CD4 T cell help is selective and limiting to the primary antibody response to influenza virus infection and that preemptive priming of CD4 T cell help can promote effective and rapid conversion of naive B cells to mature antibody-secreting cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据