4.6 Article

Structural Insight into the Unique Properties of Adeno-Associated Virus Serotype 9

期刊

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY
卷 86, 期 12, 页码 6947-6958

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.07232-11

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NIH [P41 RR-01081, R01 GM082946, P01 HL59412, R37 GM-33050, 1S10 RR020016]
  2. NSF [DMR-0225180]
  3. NIH/NCRR [RR-01646]
  4. University of California, San Diego (UCSD)
  5. Agouron Foundation
  6. NIH (ARRA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adeno-associated virus serotype 9 (AAV9) has enhanced capsid-associated tropism for cardiac muscle and the ability to cross the blood-brain barrier compared to other AAV serotypes. To help identify the structural features facilitating these properties, we have used cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) and three-dimensional image reconstruction (cryo-reconstruction) and X-ray crystallography to determine the structure of the AAV9 capsid at 9.7- and 2.8-angstrom resolutions, respectively. The AAV9 capsid exhibits the surface topology conserved in all AAVs: depressions at each icosahedral two-fold symmetry axis and surrounding each five-fold axis, three separate protrusions surrounding each three-fold axis, and a channel at each five-fold axis. The AAV9 viral protein (VP) has a conserved core structure, consisting of an eight-stranded, beta-barrel motif and the alpha A helix, which are present in all parvovirus structures. The AAV9 VP differs in nine variable surface regions (VR-I to -IX) compared to AAV4, but at only three (VR-I, VR-II, and VR-IV) compared to AAV2 and AAV8. VR-I differences modify the raised region of the capsid surface between the two-fold and five-fold depressions. The VR-IV difference produces smaller three-fold protrusions in AAV9 that are less pointed than AAV2 and AAV8. Significantly, residues in the AAV9 VRs have been identified as important determinants of cellular tropism and transduction and dictate its antigenic diversity from AAV2. Hence, the AAV9 VRs likely confer the unique infection phenotypes of this serotype.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据