4.6 Article

Evidence for a Different Susceptibility of Primate Lentiviruses to Type I Interferons

期刊

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY
卷 87, 期 5, 页码 2587-2596

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.02553-12

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. ANRS
  2. Sidaction
  3. FRM
  4. ENS-L

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Type I interferons induce a complex transcriptional program that leads to a generalized antiviral response against a large panel of viruses, including human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). However, despite the fact that interferons negatively regulate HIV-1 ex vivo, a chronic interferon state is linked to the progression of AIDS and to robust viral replication, rather than protection, in vivo. To explain this apparent contradiction, we hypothesized that HIV-1 may have evolved a partial resistance to interferon, and to test this hypothesis, we analyzed the effects of alpha interferon (IFN-alpha) on the infectivity of HIV-1, human immunodeficiency virus type 2 (HIV-2), and rhesus monkey simian immunodeficiency virus (SIVmac). The results we obtained indicate that HIV-1 is more resistant to an IFN-alpha-induced response than are HIV-2 and SIVmac. Our data indicate that the accumulation of viral DNA is more compromised following the infection of IFN-alpha-treated cells with HIV-2 and SIVmac than with HIV-1. This defect correlates with a faster destabilization of HIV-2 viral nucleoprotein complexes (VNCs), suggesting a link between VNC destabilization and impaired viral DNA (vDNA) accumulation. The differential susceptibilities to IFN-alpha of the primate lentiviruses tested here do not map to the capsid protein (CA), excluding de facto a role for human tripartite motif protein isoform 5 alpha (Trim5 alpha) in this restriction; this also suggests that an additional restriction mechanism differentially affects primate lentivirus infection. The different behaviors of HIV-1 and HIV-2 with respect to IFN-alpha responses may account at least in part for the differences in pathogenesis observed between these two virus types.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据