4.6 Article

Dengue-1 Virus Clade Replacement in Thailand Associated with Enhanced Mosquito Transmission

期刊

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY
卷 86, 期 3, 页码 1853-1861

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.06458-11

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 GM-083224]
  2. French Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-09-RPDOC-007-01]
  3. Science and Technology Directorate, Department of Homeland Security, and Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dengue viruses (DENV) are characterized by extensive genetic diversity and can be organized in multiple, genetically distinct lineages that arise and die out on a regular basis in regions where dengue is endemic. A fundamental question for understanding DENV evolution is the relative extent to which stochastic processes (genetic drift) and natural selection acting on fitness differences among lineages contribute to lineage diversity and turnover. Here, we used a set of recently collected and archived low-passage DENV-1 isolates from Thailand to examine the role of mosquito vector-virus interactions in DENV evolution. By comparing the ability of 23 viruses isolated on different dates between 1985 and 2009 to be transmitted by a present-day Aedes aegypti population from Thailand, we found that a major clade replacement event in the mid-1990s was associated with virus isolates exhibiting increased titers in the vector's hemocoel, which is predicted to result in a higher probability of transmission. This finding is consistent with the hypothesis that selection for enhanced transmission by mosquitoes is a possible mechanism underlying major DENV clade replacement events. There was significant variation in transmission potential among isolates within each clade, indicating that in addition to vector-driven selection, other evolutionary forces act to maintain viral genetic diversity. We conclude that occasional adaptive processes involving the mosquito vector can drive major DENV lineage replacement events.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据