4.6 Article

Viral Dynamics during Primary Simian Immunodeficiency Virus Infection: Effect of Time-Dependent Virus Infectivity

期刊

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY
卷 84, 期 9, 页码 4302-4310

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.02284-09

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC52-06NA25396]
  2. Center for HIV/AIDS Vaccine Immunology
  3. NIH [AI28433-19, RR06555-18, P20-RR18754, U51-RR00169, P01 AI066314]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A recent experiment involving simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) infection of macaques revealed that the infectivity of this virus decreased over the first few months of infection. Based on this observation, we introduce a viral dynamic model in which viral infectivity varies over time. The model is fit to viral load data from eight (donor) monkeys infected by intravaginal inoculation of SIVmac251, three monkeys infected by intravenous inoculation of virus isolated from the donors during the ramp-up phase of acute infection, and three monkeys infected by intravenous inoculation of virus isolated at the viral set-point. Although we only analyze data from 14 monkeys, the new model with time-dependent infectivity seems to fit the data significantly better than a widely used model with constant infectivity (P = 2.44 x 10(-11)). Our results indicate that plasma virus infectivity on average decays similar to 8-fold (95% confidence interval [CI] = 5.1 to 10.3) over the course of acute infection, with the decay occurring exponentially with an average rate of 0.28 day(-1) (95% CI = 0.14 to 0.42 day(-1)). The decay rate in set point plasma virus recipient animals is similar to 16 times slower than in ramp-up plasma virus recipient animals and similar to 6 times slower than in donor animals. Throughout acute infection up to the set-point, the infection rate is higher in ramp-up plasma virus recipient animals than in set-point plasma virus recipient animals. These results show that the infectivity depends upon the source of viral infection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据