4.6 Article

A B-Box 2 Surface Patch Important for TRIM5α Self-Association, Capsid Binding Avidity, and Retrovirus Restriction

期刊

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY
卷 83, 期 20, 页码 10737-10751

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.01307-09

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [1K99MH086162-01]
  2. American Foundation for AIDS Research Mathilde Krim [106987-43-RFHF]
  3. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
  4. Riken Structural Genomics/Proteomics Initiative of the National Project on Protein Structural and Functional Analyses, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan
  5. [K99/R00]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

TRIM5 alpha is a tripartite motif (TRIM) protein that consists of RING, B-box 2, coiled-coil, and B30.2(SPRY) domains. The TRIM5 alpha(rh) protein from rhesus monkeys recognizes the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) capsid as it enters the host cell and blocks virus infection prior to reverse transcription. HIV-1-restricting ability can be eliminated by disruption of the B-box 2 domain. Changes in the TRIM5 alpha(rh) B-box 2 domain have been associated with alterations in TRIM5 alpha(rh) turnover, the formation of cytoplasmic bodies and higher-order oligomerization. We present here the nuclear magnetic resonance structure of the TRIM5 B-box 2 domain and identify an unusual hydrophobic patch (cluster 1) on the domain surface. Alteration of cluster 1 or the flanking arginine 121 resulted in various degrees of inactivation of HIV-1 restriction, in some cases depending on compensatory changes in other nearby charged residues. For this panel of TRIM5 alpha(rh) B-box 2 mutants, inhibition of HIV-1 infection was strongly correlated with higher-order self-association and binding affinity for capsid complexes but not with TRIM5 alpha(rh) half-life or the formation of cytoplasmic bodies. Thus, promoting cooperative TRIM5 alpha(rh) interactions with the HIV-1 capsid represents a major mechanism whereby the B-box 2 domain potentiates HIV-1 restriction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据