4.6 Article

Testing the Balanced Electrostatic Interaction Hypothesis of Hepatitis B Virus DNA Synthesis by Using an In Vivo Charge Rebalance Approach

期刊

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY
卷 84, 期 5, 页码 2340-2351

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.01666-09

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. UTMB John Sealy Foundation [U.S. NIH RO1]
  2. Summit- III Project of Academia Sinica, Taiwan
  3. National Science Council of the Republic of China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Previously, a charge balance hypothesis was proposed to explain hepatitis B virus (HBV) capsid stability, assembly, RNA encapsidation, and DNA replication. This hypothesis emphasized the importance of a balanced electrostatic interaction between the positive charge from the arginine-rich domain (ARD) of the core protein (HBc) and the negative charge from the encapsidated nucleic acid. It remains unclear if any of the negative charge involved in this electrostatic interaction could come from the HBc protein per se, in addition to the encapsidated nucleic acid. HBc ARD IV mutant 173GG and ARD II mutant 173RR/R157A/R158A are arginine deficient and replication defective. Not surprisingly, the replication defect of ARD IV mutant 173GG can be rescued by restoring positively charged amino acids at the adjacent positions 174 and 175. However, most interestingly, it can be at least partially rescued by reducing negatively charged residues in the assembly domain, such as by glutamic acid-to-alanine (E-to-A) substitutions at position 46 or 117 and to a much lesser extent at position 113. Similar results were obtained for ARD II mutant 173RR/R157A/R158A. These amino acids are located on the inner surfaces of HBc icosahedral particles, and their acidic side chains point toward the capsid interior. For HBV DNA synthesis, the relative amount of positive versus negative charge in the electrostatic interactions is more important than the absolute amount of positive or negative charge. These results support the concept that balanced electrostatic interaction is important during the viral life cycle.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据