4.6 Article

Mouse Hepatitis Virus Liver Pathology Is Dependent on ADP-Ribose-1-Phosphatase, a Viral Function Conserved in the Alpha-Like Supergroup

期刊

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY
卷 82, 期 24, 页码 12325-12334

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.02082-08

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation
  2. European Commission [SP22-CT-2004-511064, LSHP-CT-2006-037416, HEALTHF4-2008-202156]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Viral infection of the liver can lead to severe tissue damage when high levels of viral replication and spread in the organ are coupled with strong induction of inflammatory responses. Here we report an unexpected correlation between the expression of a functional X domain encoded by the hepatotropic mouse hepatitis virus strain A59 (MHV-A59), the high-level production of inflammatory cytokines, and the induction of acute viral hepatitis in mice. X-domain (also called macro domain) proteins possess poly-ADP-ribose binding and/or ADP-ribose-1 ''-phosphatase (ADRP) activity. They are conserved in coronaviruses and in members of the alpha-like supergroup of phylogenetically related positive-strand RNA viruses that includes viruses of medical importance, such as rubella virus and hepatitis E virus. By using reverse genetics, we constructed a recombinant murine coronavirus MHV-A59 mutant encoding a single-amino-acid substitution of a strictly conserved residue that is essential for coronaviral ADRP activity. We found that the mutant virus replicated to slightly reduced titers in livers but, strikingly, did not induce liver disease. In vitro, the mutant virus induced only low levels of the inflammatory cytokines tumor necrosis factor alpha and interleukin-6 (IL-6). In vivo, we found that IL-6 production, in particular, was reduced in the spleens and livers of mutant virus-infected mice. Collectively, our data demonstrate that the MHV X domain exacerbates MHV-induced liver pathology, most likely through the induction of excessive inflammatory cytokine expression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据