4.6 Article

Host Responses to Wild-Type and Attenuated Herpes Simplex Virus Infection in the Absence of Stat1

期刊

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY
卷 83, 期 5, 页码 2075-2087

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.02007-08

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [EY10707, EY09083, 1F32 AI65069-01A2, P30 DA015625]
  2. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences [P30EY02687]
  3. Department from Research to Prevent Blindness and a Lew Wasserman Scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Humans and mice lacking the interferon signaling molecule Stat1 are sensitive to a variety of pathogens due to their presumed inability to mount a strong innate immune response. The herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) virion host shutoff (vhs) protein is a multifunctional immunomodulator that counteracts the innate immune response and viruses lacking vhs are attenuated and effective live vaccines in animal models. To investigate the interplay of viruses with an immunocompromised host, we performed functional genomics analyses on control and Stat1(-/-) mouse corneas infected with wild-type or vhs-null viruses. In control mice, correlative with viral growth, both viruses induced a transient increase in immunomodulators, followed by viral clearance. In contrast, infection of the Stat1(-/-) mice induced a heightened and prolonged induction of inflammatory modulators for both viruses, manifesting as a significant immune cell infiltrate and ocular disease. Moreover, while wild-type virus infection of Stat1(-/-) was always lethal, vhs-null infection was rarely lethal. There was a significant increase in Stat3- and interleukin-6 (IL-6)-dependent transcription in Stat1-/- mice, implicating the Stat3 and IL-6 pathways in the observed ocular pathology. Further, infected Stat1-/- mice showed phosphorylated Stat3 in the corneal epithelium. Our data show a role for vhs in evading innate host responses and a role for Stat1 in limiting virus infection and for facilitating an appropriate nonpathological inflammatory response.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据