4.6 Article

Genetic History of Hepatitis C Virus in East Asia

期刊

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY
卷 83, 期 2, 页码 1071-1082

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.01501-08

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Royal Society
  2. Medical Research Council (United Kingdom)
  3. Wellcome Trust
  4. Marie Curie IEF fellowship
  5. NIHR Biomedical Research Centre Programme
  6. James Martin School for the 21st Century
  7. MRC [G108/601] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. Medical Research Council [G108/601] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The hepatitis C virus (HCV), which currently infects an estimated 3% of people worldwide, has been present in some human populations for several centuries, notably HCV genotypes 1 and 2 in West Africa and genotype 6 in Southeast Asia. Here we use newly developed methods of sequence analysis to conduct the first comprehensive investigation of the epidemic and evolutionary history of HCV in Asia. Our analysis includes new HCV core (n = 16) and NS5B (n = 14) gene sequences, obtained from serum samples of jaundiced patients from Laos. These exceptionally diverse isolates were analyzed in conjunction with all available reference strains using phylogenetic and Bayesian coalescent methods. We performed statistical tests of phylogeographic structure and applied a recently developed relaxed molecular clock approach to HCV for the first time, which indicated an unexpectedly high degree of rate variation. Our results reveal a > 1,000-year-long development of genotype 6 in Asia, characterized by substantial phylogeographic structure and two distinct phases of epidemic history, before and during the 20th century. We conclude that HCV lineages representing preexisting and spatially restricted strains were involved in multiple, independent local epidemics during the 20th century. Our analysis explains the generation and maintenance of HCV diversity in Asia and could provide a template for further investigations of HCV spread in other regions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据