4.6 Article

Poly(rC) binding proteins and the 5′ cloverleaf of uncapped poliovirus mRNA function during de novo assembly of polysomes

期刊

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY
卷 82, 期 12, 页码 5835-5846

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.01513-07

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [R21 AI042189, T32 AI007537, AI42189, R01 AI042189, R56 AI042189, T32 AI07537] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Poliovirus (PV) mRNA is unusual because it possesses a 5'-terminal monophosphate rather than a 5'-terminal cap. Uncapped mRNAs are typically degraded by the 5' exonuclease XRN1. A 5'-terminal cloverleaf RNA structure interacts with poly(rC) binding proteins (PCBPs) to protect uncapped PV mRNA from 5' exonuclease (K. E. Murray, A. W. Roberts, and D. J. Barton, RNA 7:1126-1141, 2001). In this study, we examined de novo polysome formation using HeLa cell-free translation-replication reactions. PV mRNA formed polysomes coordinate with the time needed for ribosomes to traverse the viral open reading frame (ORF). Nascent PV polypeptides cofractionated with viral polysomes, while mature PV proteins were released from the polysomes. Alterations in the size of the PV ORF correlated with alterations in the size of polysomes with ribosomes present every 250 to 500 nucleotides of the ORF. Eukaryotic initiation factor 4GI (eIF4GI) was cleaved rapidly as viral polysomes assembled and the COOH-terminal portion of eIF4GI cofractionated with viral polysomes. Poly(A) binding protein, along with PCBP I and 2, also cofractionated with viral polysomes. A C24A mutation that inhibits PCBP-5'-terminal cloverleaf RNA interactions inhibited the formation and stability of nascent PV polysomes. Kinetic analyses indicated that the PCBP-5' cloverleaf RNA interaction was necessary to protect PV mRNA from 5' exonuclease immediately as ribosomes initially traversed the viral ORF, before viral proteins could alter translation factors within nascent polysomes or contribute to ribonucleoprotein complexes at the termini of the viral mRNA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据