4.4 Article

Multiplex reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification for the simultaneous detection of CVB and CSVd in chrysanthemum

期刊

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS
卷 210, 期 -, 页码 26-31

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2014.09.008

关键词

Chrysanthemum Virus B; Chrysanthemum stunt viroid; Multiplex; Reverse transcription loop-mediated; isothermal amplification; Restriction enzyme

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31171990]
  2. General Administration of Quality Supervision [201310068, 20132K267]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A multiplex reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (mRT-LAMP) assay was developed for the simultaneous detection of Chrysanthemum Virus B (CVB) and Chrysanthemum stunt viroid (CSVd), which are the major viral pathogens of chrysanthemum worldwide. Two sets of mRT-LAMP primers were designed for the coat protein gene of CVB and the complete nucleotide sequence of CSVd, and a restriction enzyme cleavage site was inserted into two pairs of species-specific primers. The mRT-LAMP assay was designed by combining these two sets fora total of eight primers. The mRT-LAMP method distinguished between CVB and CSVd due to the subsequent restriction enzyme analysis. The sensitivity of the mRT-LAMP method was 10(3) times higher than classical PCR regarding the detection limits for CVB and CSVd. No positive results were observed when RNA from other chrysanthemum pathogens were used as mRT-LAMP templates. The method was verified by testing chrysanthemum samples collected from Beijing and Henan Province and showed high reliability and sensitivity. The developed mRT-LAMP assay also offers an efficient, convenient, and rapid tool for screening chrysanthemum virus and viroid, especially CVB and CSVd, and can be diagnosed in a single reaction. These results suggest that the new mRT-LAMP method may be used routinely for virus and viroid surveys. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据