4.4 Article

Detection of Papaya leaf distortion mosaic virus by reverse-transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification

期刊

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS
卷 195, 期 -, 页码 174-179

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2013.09.011

关键词

Papaya leaf distortion mosaic virus; PLDMV detection; Reverse-transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification; RT-PCR

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31000844, 31171822, 31371918]
  2. Major Technology Project of Hainan [ZDZX2013023-1, ZDXM20120027]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Papaya leaf distortion mosaic virus (PLDMV) can infect transgenic papaya resistant to a related pathogen, Papaya ringspot virus (PRSV), posing a substantial threat to papaya production in China. Current detection methods, however, are unable to be used for rapid detection in the field. Here, a reverse-transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) assay was developed for the detection of PLDMV, using a set of four RT-LAMP primers designed based on the conserved sequence of PLDMV CP. The RT-LAMP method detected specifically PLDMV and was highly sensitive, with a detection limit of 1.32 x 10(-6) mu g of total RNA per reaction. Indeed, the reaction was 10 times more sensitive than one-step RT-PCR, while also requiring significantly less time and equipment. The effectiveness of RT-LAMP and one-step RT-PCR in detecting the virus were compared using 90 field samples of non-transgenic papaya and 90 field samples of commercialized PRSV-resistant transgenic papaya from Hainan Island. None of the non-transgenic papaya tested positive for PLDMV using either method. In contrast, 19 of the commercialized PRSV-resistant transgenic papaya samples tested positive by RT-LAMP assay, and 6 of those tested negative by RT-PCR. Therefore, the PLDMV-specific RT-LAMP is a simple, rapid, sensitive, and cost-effective tool in the field diagnosis and control of PLDMV. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据