4.4 Article

Simultaneous and complete genome sequencing of influenza A and B with high coverage by Illumina MiSeq Platform

期刊

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS
卷 193, 期 2, 页码 394-404

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2013.07.001

关键词

Influenza; Deep sequencing; Next-generation sequencing (NGS)

资金

  1. Armed Forces Health Surveillance Center - Global Emerging Infections Surveillance and Response System (AFHSC-GEIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Active global surveillance and characterization of influenza viruses are essential for better preparation against possible pandemic events. Obtaining comprehensive information about the influenza genome can improve our understanding of the evolution- of influenza viruses and emergence of new strains, and improve the accuracy when designing preventive vaccines. This study investigated the use of deep sequencing by the next-generation sequencing (NGS) Illumina MiSeq Platform to obtain complete genome sequence information from influenza virus isolates. The influenza virus isolates were cultured from 6 respiratory acute clinical specimens collected in Thailand and Nepal. DNA libraries obtained from each viral isolate were mixed and all were sequenced simultaneously. Total information of 2.6 Gbases was obtained from a 455 14 K/mm(2) density with 95.76% (8,571,655/8,950,724 clusters) of the clusters passing quality control (QC) filters. Approximately 93.7% of all sequences from Readl and 83.5% from Read2 contained high quality sequences that were >= Q30, a base calling QC score standard. Alignments analysis identified three seasonal influenza A H3N2 strains, one 2009 pandemic influenza A H1N1 strain and two influenza B strains. The nearly entire genomes of all six virus isolates yielded equal or greater than 600-fold sequence coverage depth. MiSeq Platform identified seasonal influenza A H3N2, 2009 pandemic influenza A H1Nland influenza B in the DNA library mixtures efficiently. (C) 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据