4.4 Article

Development and validation of a microarray for the confirmation and typing of norovirus RT-PCR products

期刊

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS
卷 173, 期 2, 页码 233-250

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2011.02.011

关键词

Norovirus; Microarray; Genotyping

资金

  1. Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs [FS6051]
  2. Food and Consumer Safety Action Plan at Health Canada
  3. Science Branch of the Canadian Food Inspection Agency
  4. European Union at the University of Barcelona [CSD2007-00016]
  5. Nordic Joint Committee for Agricultural Research [NKJ-130]
  6. Mecesup [UCH0115]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Noroviruses are implicated in many worldwide institutional, food and waterborne outbreaks each year. Genetic typing of isolates is valuable for monitoring outbreak spread as well as variation in circulating strains. Microarrays have the potential to provide rapid genotype information for norovirus samples. The NoroChip v3.0 provides an oligonucleotide hybridization platform to screen for over 600 potential interactions in each experiment. The NoroChip v3.0 was developed at Health Canada and validated in seven international partner laboratories. Each laboratory validated the NoroChip v3.0 using norovirus amplicons routinely characterized in their testing protocols. Fragments from the capsid region (region C) and a 2.4 kb amplicon spanning polymerase and capsid sequences (region AD) were validated in six of the partner laboratories and provided correct genogroup typing information (GI or GII) when hybridized to the NoroChip v3.0. Results indicate that the current limiting factor for implementing the NoroChip v3.0 as a strain typing tool is the difficulty obtaining a long, specific amplicon from all circulating norovirus strains. Data obtained with the longer region AD amplicon provided the best discrimination between norovirus strains. Crown Copyright (C) 2011 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据