4.4 Article

Comparison of standard PCR/cloning to single genome sequencing for analysis of HIV-1 populations

期刊

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS
卷 168, 期 1-2, 页码 114-120

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2010.04.030

关键词

HIV; Single genome sequencing (SGS); pro-pol diversity; Cloning and sequencing; Treatment naive

资金

  1. National institute for Allergy and Infectious Disease [T32 AI07389, CFAAR 1P30A142853-10, K24 A1055293-06A1, K23 AI074423-03]
  2. Center for Drug Abuse and AIDS Research [P30 DA013868]
  3. George Kirby Foundation
  4. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [ZIABC010819] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [T32AI007389, K23AI074423] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  6. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE [P30DA013868] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To compare standard PCR/cloning and single genome sequencing (SGS) in their ability to reflect actual intra-patient polymorphism of HIV-1 populations, a total of 530 HIV-1 pro-pol sequences obtained by both sequencing techniques from a set of 17 ART naive patient specimens was analyzed. For each specimen, 12 and 15 sequences, on average, were characterized by the two techniques. Using phylogenetic analysis, tests for panmixia and entropy, and Bland-Altman plots, no difference in population structure or genetic diversity was shown in 14 of the 17 subjects. Evidence of sampling bias by the presence of subsets of identical sequences was found by either method. Overall, the study shows that neither method was more biased than the other, and providing that an adequate number of PCR templates is analyzed, and that the bulk sequencing captures the diversity of the viral population, either method is likely to provide a similar measure of population diversity. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据