4.4 Article

High yield expression and purification of HIV-1 Tat1-72 for structural studies

期刊

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS
卷 164, 期 1-2, 页码 35-42

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2009.11.021

关键词

HIV; Tat; Transcriptional regulator; Intrinsically disordered protein; Cysteine-rich; NMR spectroscopy

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  2. University of Manitoba
  3. Medical Research Council of Canada
  4. Manitoba Health Research Council
  5. Canadian Foundation for Innovation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The HIV-1 transactivator of transcription (Tat) is a protein essential for virus replication. Tat is an intrinsically disordered RNA-binding protein that, in cooperation with host cell factors cyclin T1 and cyclin-dependent kinase 9, regulates transcription at the level of elongation. Tat also interacts with numerous other intracellular and extracellular proteins, and is implicated in a number of pathogenic processes. The physico-chemical properties of Tat make it a particularly challenging target for structural studies: Tat contains seven Cys residues, six of which are essential for transactivation, and is highly susceptible to oxidative cross-linking and aggregation. In addition, a basic segment (residues 48-57) gives the protein a high net positive charge of +12 at pH 7, endowing it with a high affinity for anionic polymers and surfaces. In order to study the structure of Tat, both alone and in complex with partner molecules, we have developed a system for the bacterial expression and purification of 6x Histidine-tagged and isotopically enriched (in N-15 and C-13) recombinant HIV-1 Tat(1-72) (BH10 isolate) that yields large amounts of protein. These preparations have facilitated the assignment of 95% of the backbone NMR resonances. Analysis by mass spectrometry and NMR demonstrate that the cysteine-rich Tat protein is unambiguously reduced, monomeric, and unfolded in aqueous solution at pH 4. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据