4.2 Article

The validity of serum markers for fibrosis staging in chronic hepatitis B and C

期刊

JOURNAL OF VIRAL HEPATITIS
卷 21, 期 12, 页码 930-937

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jvh.12224

关键词

APRI; chronic hepatitis; comparative effectiveness; FIB-4; liver stage prediction; serum markers of fibrosis

资金

  1. AbbVie Pharmaceuticals
  2. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  3. Gilead Pharmaceuticals
  4. GlaxoSmithKline
  5. Intercept Pharmaceuticals
  6. Merck
  7. Vertex Pharmaceuticals
  8. CDC Foundation
  9. AbbVie
  10. Genentech, a Member of the Roche Group
  11. Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson Johnson
  12. Gilead Sciences
  13. Bristol-Meyers-Squibb
  14. Henry Ford Health System

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Assessment of liver fibrosis is critical for successful individualized disease management in persons with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) or chronic hepatitis C (CHC). We expanded and validated serum marker indices to provide accurate, reproducible and easily applied methods of fibrosis assessment. Liver biopsy results from over 284 CHB and 2304 CHC patients in the Chronic Hepatitis Cohort Study (CHeCS') were mapped to a F0-F4 equivalent scale. APRI and FIB-4 scores within a 6-month window of biopsy were mapped to the same scale. A novel algorithm was applied to derive and validate optimal cut-offs for differentiating fibrosis levels. For the prediction of advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis, the FIB-4 score outperformed the other serum marker indices in the CHC cohort and was similar to APRI in the CHB cohort. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROC) for FIB-4 in differentiating F3-F4 from F0-F2 was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.80-0.92) for CHB and 0.83 (95% CI: 0.81-0.85) for CHC. The suggested cut-offs based on FIB-4 model produced high positive predictive values [CHB: 90.0% for F0-F2, 100.0% for cirrhosis (F4); CHC: 89.7% for F0-F2; 82.9% for cirrhosis (F4)]. In this large observational cohort, FIB-4 predicted the upper and lower end of liver fibrosis stage (cirrhosis and F0-F2, respectively) with a high degree of accuracy in both CHB and CHC patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据