4.2 Article

Telbivudine protects renal function in patients with chronic hepatitis B infection in conjunction with adefovir-based combination therapy

期刊

JOURNAL OF VIRAL HEPATITIS
卷 21, 期 12, 页码 873-881

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jvh.12217

关键词

adefovir dipivoxil; chronic hepatitis B; combination therapy; renal function; telbivudine

资金

  1. Basic Research Laboratory Program of the National Research Foundation of Korea - Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2010-0001200]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Previous studies have demonstrated that the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection with adefovir (ADV) can impair renal function. In contrast, treatment with telbivudine (LdT) improves renal function in CHB patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the renoprotective effect of LdT in CHB patients receiving ADV-based combination therapy. The effects of treatment with ADV + LdT on renal function were compared to those resulting from treatment with ADV + entecavir (ETV), ADV + lamivudine (LAM), ADV alone and ETV alone. The consecutive cohort analysis included 831 CHB patients who received ADV + LdT, ADV + LAM, ADV + ETV, ADV alone or ETV alone for 96weeks. Alterations in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were compared between the five groups using a linear mixed-effects model. HBV DNA levels were also compared between the five groups during the 96-week period. Among the five treatment groups, significant improvements in eGFR were observed in the ADV + LdT and ADV + LAM groups over time (P<0.001 for each group compared with baseline eGFR). In patients with a baseline eGFR between 50 and 90mL/min, the change in eGFR was the most significant in the ADV + LdT group (+0.641mL/min; P<0.001). Age, gender, baseline eGFR and treatment option were significant predictive factors for eGFR changes. In conclusion, our results suggest that the combination therapy of LdT and ADV is significantly associated with renoprotective effects in CHB patients when compared with other ADV-based combination or single therapies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据