4.6 Article

Incentive for Peer-to-Peer Knowledge Sharing among Farmers in Developing Economies

期刊

PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT
卷 24, 期 9, 页码 1430-1440

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/poms.12328

关键词

socially responsible operations; knowledge sharing; strategic farmers' behavior; game theory

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [CMMI 1068862, CMMI 1265671, CMMI1031637]
  2. National Science Foundation of China [71210002, 71332005]
  3. Purdue OVPR Incentive Grant II

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the peer-to-Peer interactions among farmers when both knowledge learning and sharing are available. We construct a stylized model in which heterogeneous farmers are endowed with their initial production capabilities and can post questions in the platform for help. A representative expert regularly monitors the forum and provides answers to the farmers' questions, but may be non-responsive sometimes due to the limited capacity. A knowledgeable core user (farmer) can choose to be silent or responsive, and is allowed to strategically determine the informativeness of her answers. The farmers face the minimum quantity restriction for attracting the buyers, and must make production before the time of sales. We show that in equilibrium the core user never provides answers that are more informative than the expert's, irrespective of her ex ante knowledge level. Redesigning or restructuring the platform does not help eliminate this inefficient knowledge provision. We also find that hiring more staff to frequently monitor the forum turns out to be detrimental for the peer-to-peer interactions. Moreover, the competition on knowledge sharing between the platform expert and the core user features strategic complementarity sometimes but strategic substitution at other times. Third, charging for the platform usage may discourage uninformative answers, but it could also discourage the core user from sharing knowledge with other farmers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据