4.1 Article

Molecular Analysis of Aspermic Fasciola Flukes from Korea on the Basis of the Nuclear ITS1 Region and Mitochondrial DNA Markers and Comparison with Japanese Aspermic Fasciola Flukes

期刊

JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICAL SCIENCE
卷 74, 期 7, 页码 899-904

出版社

JAPAN SOC VET SCI
DOI: 10.1292/jvms.11-0523

关键词

aspermic Fasciola fluke; cox1; ITS1; nad1

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  2. [2245037]
  3. [2340544]
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [11J05089] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It has been speculated that populations of aspermic Fasciola flukes in Korea and Japan have a close phylogenctic relationship. To evaluate this, we analyzed 33 Korean aspermic Fasciola flukes on the basis of nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) and mitochondrial NADH dehydrogenase subunit 1 (nad1) and cytochrome c oxidase 1 (cox1) sequences. Fh, Fg, and Fh/Fg types were detected in the ITS1 region and displayed the fragment patterns of F. hepatica, F. gigantica, and both species, respectively by a polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) method. Additionally, three concatenated haplotypes of nad1 and cox1(nad1/cox1) were detected, and 2 of these, Kor1/Kor1 (Fsp1/Fsp1) haplotype and Kor2a/Kor2 (Fsp2/Fsp2) haplotype, were shared by Korean and Japanese aspermic flukes. The Fst value (0.019), calculated using the concatenated sequences, indicated that Korean and Japanese aspermic Fasciola populations were genetically undifferentiated. Interestingly, a combination of the Fh/Fg type and Kor1/Kor1 haplotype was found at the highest frequency in Korean aspermic flukes, whereas the Fg type and Fsp2/Fsp2 haplotype combination was found at a conspicuously high frequency in Japanese aspermic flukes. This indicates that a founder effect caused by the introduction of infected hosts may have played a key role in the introduction of aspermic Fasciola flukes from Korea into Japan.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据