4.4 Article

Time-dependent antiarrhythmic effects of flecainide on induced atrial fibrillation in horses

期刊

JOURNAL OF VETERINARY INTERNAL MEDICINE
卷 32, 期 5, 页码 1708-1717

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jvim.15287

关键词

arrhythmia; atria; cardioversion; electrocardiography; heart; wide QRS tachycardia

资金

  1. European Union Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [675351]
  2. Augustinus Foundation [14-4713]
  3. Kustos Foundation of 1881 [14-4713]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundObjectivePharmacological treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) in horses can be challenging because of low efficacy and adverse effects. Flecainide has been tested with variable efficacy. To test whether the efficacy of flecainide is dependent on AF duration. AnimalsMethodsNine Standardbred mares. Factorial study design. All horses were instrumented with a pacemaker and assigned to a control or an AF group. On day 0, all horses were in sinus rhythm and received 2 mg/kg flecainide IV. Atrial fibrillation subsequently was induced in the AF group by pacemaker stimulation. On days 3, 9, 27, and 55, flecainide was administered to all horses, regardless of heart rhythm. ResultsConclusions and Clinical ImportanceAll horses in AF cardioverted to sinus rhythm on days 3 and 9. On day 27, 5/6 horses cardioverted, whereas only 2/6 cardioverted on day 55. The time from the start of flecainide infusion to cardioversion (range, 3-185min, log transformed) showed linear correlation with the cumulative duration of AF (r(2)=.80, P<.0001). Flecainide induced abnormal QRS complexes in 4/6 AF horses and 1/3 controls. A positive correlation was found between heart rate before flecainide infusion and number of abnormal QRS complexes (0.14, P<.05). One horse suffered from cardiac arrest and died after flecainide infusion. Flecainide is effective for cardioversion of short-term induced AF, but the effect decreases with AF duration. Controlling heart rate may minimize adverse effects caused by flecainide, but the drug should be used with great caution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据