4.4 Article

Qualitative and Quantitative Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonographic Assessment of Cerulein-Induced Acute Pancreatitis in Dogs

期刊

JOURNAL OF VETERINARY INTERNAL MEDICINE
卷 28, 期 2, 页码 496-503

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/jvim.12319

关键词

Contrast-ultrasound; Perfusion; Pancreas; Inflammation

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [23580436]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25850203, 23580436, 13J01112] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Acute pancreatitis (AP) is the most common disease of the canine exocrine pancreas, and accurate noninvasive diagnosis is challenging. Hypothesis/Objectives To determine the feasibility of using quantitative contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) to detect pancreatic perfusional changes in cerulein-induced AP in dogs. Animals Six adult female Beagles. Methods Each dog received 2hours of IV infusion with 7.5 mu g/kg/h of cerulein diluted in saline. As control, all dogs received 2hours of IV infusion of saline 2weeks before cerulein infusion. CEUS of the pancreas and duodenum were performed before (0hour), and at 2, 4, 6, and 12hours after saline and cerulein infusion. Time-intensity curves were created from regions of interest in the pancreas and duodenum. Five perfusional parameters were measured for statistical analysis: time to initial up-slope, peak time, time to wash-out, peak intensity (PI), and area under the curve (AUC). Results In cerulein-induced AP, pancreatic PI increased at 2 and 4hours when compared to 0hour, and at 2, 4, and 6hours when compared to control. AUC increased at 4hours when compared to 0hour, and at 2 and 4hours when compared to control. Time to wash-out was prolonged at 4hours when compared to control. For saline control, peak time was faster at 2hours when compared to 0hour. Conclusions and Clinical Importance CEUS parameters PI and AUC can provide useful information in differentiating acute pancreatitis from normal pancreas. Cerulein-induced AP was characterized by prolonged hyperechoic enhancement on CEUS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据