4.4 Article

Insulin Resistance Selectively Alters Cell-Surface Glucose Transporters but not their Total Protein Expression in Equine Skeletal Muscle

期刊

JOURNAL OF VETERINARY INTERNAL MEDICINE
卷 25, 期 2, 页码 315-321

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2010.0674.x

关键词

AS160; Biotinylated photo-affinity label; GLUT (4 and 12) trafficking

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [K01RR 023083-01]
  2. American Quarter Horse Association

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Insulin resistance (IR) has been widely recognized in humans, and more recently in horses, but its underlying mechanisms are still not well understood. The translocation of glucose transporter 4 (GLUT4) to the cell surface is the limiting step for glucose uptake in insulin-sensitive tissues. Although the downstream signaling pathways regulating GLUT translocation are not well defined, AS160 recently has emerged as a potential key component. In addition, the role of GLUT12, one of the most recently identified insulin-sensitive GLUTs, during IR is unknown. Hypothesis/Objectives We hypothesized that cell-surface GLUT will be decreased in muscle by an AS160-dependent pathway in horses with IR. Animals Insulin-sensitive (IS) or IR mares (n = 5/group). Methods Muscle biopsies were performed in mares classified as IS or IR based on results of an insulin-modified frequently sampled IV glucose tolerance test. By an exofacial bis-mannose photolabeled method, we specifically quantified active cell-surface GLUT4 and GLUT12 transporters. Total GLUT4 and GLUT12 and AS160 protein expression were measured by Western blots. Results IR decreased basal cell-surface GLUT4 expression (P = .027), but not GLUT12, by an AS160-independent pathway, without affecting total GLUT4 and GLUT12 content. Cell-surface GLUT4 was not further enhanced by insulin stimulation in either group. Conclusions and Clinical Importance IR induced defects in the skeletal muscle glucose transport pathway by decreasing active cell-surface GLUT4.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据