4.4 Article

Relationship among Plasma Amino Acids, C-Reactive Protein, Illness Severity, and Outcome in Critically Ill Dogs

期刊

JOURNAL OF VETERINARY INTERNAL MEDICINE
卷 23, 期 3, 页码 559-563

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2009.0296.x

关键词

Critical care nutrition; Nutritional status; Response to inflammation

资金

  1. Waltham Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alterations in circulating amino acids have been documented in animal models and in critically ill people but have not been evaluated in dogs with spontaneously occurring disease. To compare amino acid concentrations in critically ill dogs and healthy controls and to investigate potential relationships among amino acids, markers of inflammation, illness severity, and clinical outcome. Forty-eight critically ill dogs and 24 healthy control dogs. Plasma was analyzed for amino acids and C-reactive protein (CRP) was measured in serum. The Fischer ratio (the molar ratio of branched chain amino acids [BCAA] to aromatic amino acids [AAA]) and survival prediction index (SPI2) were calculated. Median CRP concentrations were significantly higher in the critically ill dogs compared with controls (P < .001). Critically ill dogs had significantly lower concentrations of alanine (P = .001), arginine (P < .001), citrulline (P < .001), glycine (P < .001), methionine (P < .001), proline (P < .001), and serine (P = .001) but significantly higher concentrations of lysine (P = .02) and phenylalanine (P < .001; Table 1). This pattern resulted in a significantly lower Fischer ratio (P = .001) in the critically ill group. Median SPI2 score was significantly higher in dogs that survived (P = .03). Concentrations of arginine (P = .02), isoleucine (P = .01), leucine (P = .04), serine (P = .04), valine (P = .04), total BCAA (P = .03), and the Fischer ratio (P = .03) were significantly higher in survivors compared with nonsurvivors. Critically ill dogs have altered amino acid profiles and additional research to investigate potential benefits of amino acid supplementation is warranted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据