4.6 Article

Cloning, expression and in silico studies of a serine protease from a marine actinomycete (Nocardiopsis sp NCIM 5124)

期刊

PROCESS BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 50, 期 3, 页码 378-387

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2014.12.025

关键词

Cloning and expression; Protease; Kinetic stability; Actinomycetes; Thermal simulation

资金

  1. Commonwealth Commission, UK
  2. CSIR, New Delhi, India
  3. BBSRC [BB/E007384/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/E007384/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A serine protease (N. protease), from Nocardiopsis sp., was cloned and expressed in Escherichia coli and investigated for its potential kinetic stability. Protein expression using two vectors, pET-22b (+) and pET-39b (+) was compared based on proper folding and soluble expression of the protein. pET-39b (+) was found to be a better vector for soluble expression of this protease containing disulfide bonds. In silico studies were also carried out for N. protease. Homology modeling suggested N. protease to be a member of PA clan of proteases. The phylogenetic analysis showed relatedness of N. protease to kinetically stable proteases. Molecular docking studies performed exhibited interaction of a peptide substrate with catalytic pocket of the enzyme. High temperature MD simulations were performed on N. protease to study its unfolding behavior and comparisons were made with alpha LP. A novel approach to study 'cooperativity' of protein unfolding was undertaken, wherein 'P' value analysis based on phi and psi values of the protein was performed. Data showed sharper P value transition for alpha LP when compared to N. protease thus indicating relatively less kinetic stability of N. protease. Present study holds significance as the non-streptomycete actinomycetes group is least explored and ensures industrially important enzymes with exceptional stabilities. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据